Timeline for Why was the virtual microphone question closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2014 at 9:00 | vote | accept | ComFreek | ||
| Aug 25, 2014 at 23:33 | comment | added | Izzy | I definitely agree with you on the "not without comment" part! Whenever I happen upon such a question in the review queue (on SR or ASE), I usually place a comment. But as you can see, I wasn't involved here ;) Especially here on SR we should do so for cases like this – even more when the "pointer" doesn't offer a satisfactory explanation. | |
| Aug 25, 2014 at 20:32 | comment | added | ComFreek | Please see the edit of my question above. I agree with you - the question could have been made more clear and all the additional requests stripped off. However - as my edit says - I don't consider closing the question without comments the right action here. Speaking more generally, we should try to keep the open and friendly attitude here on SR. | |
| Aug 25, 2014 at 20:06 | history | answered | Izzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |