Timeline for ambiguous tag: "duplicate-display"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 8, 2015 at 21:46 | comment | added | Izzy |
We already have a networking tag, so that's not an issue :) But "networking" is not the primary idea behind those questions, though you're correct it's mostly related – so I wouldn't force it upon them unless it's explicitely required.
|
|
| Mar 8, 2015 at 21:08 | comment | added | Tymric |
@Izzy Yes, I agree with your edited answer, +1. The networking tag might also be needed for the re-tagging in your first point since usually display mirroring occurs over a network connection.
|
|
| Mar 8, 2015 at 21:03 | comment | added | Izzy |
Full ack to that. And after all, we can create display-mirroring anytime later if we feel it necessary. // Can I conclude then you agree with the edited variant of my answer (which is rather a merge of our "original" answers)?
|
|
| Mar 8, 2015 at 20:59 | comment | added | Tymric |
@Izzy I am not suggesting the creation of a new tag, but simply renaming the duplicate-display into a less vague display-mirroring. The end result is still one more tag than your edited answer though, so you make a good point. Two questions aren't enough. It makes more sense to re-tag them into display + networking depending on the contents of each question
|
|
| Mar 8, 2015 at 20:36 | comment | added | Izzy |
Good points, especially with the file-management tag suggestion – as that already exists. But keeping in mind the general rule to "avoid creating new tags if possible": Do you really think those two questions justify a new tag right now? We've also got the multi-monitor tag which might cover this.
|
|
| Mar 8, 2015 at 19:05 | history | answered | Tymric | CC BY-SA 3.0 |