4

I'm Undo. Here are my answers (on the short side right now because I'm pressed for time, will flesh them out later): Do you think that the current policy of "delete-on-sight (with a comment)" for low quality answers should continue? What, if any, changes would you make / suggest? Yes. It's served us well so far, and I don't see a reason to stop ...


2

Do you think that the current policy of "delete-on-sight (with a comment)" for low quality answers should continue? What, if any, changes would you make / suggest? To me, there's a difference between "dark" and "black". If I attribute "low quality" to "willing, but inexperienced", I prefer giving newcomers a chance instead of scaring them away – which ...


1

Nicolas Raoul Do you think that the current policy of "delete-on-sight (with a comment)" for low quality answers should continue? What, if any, changes would you make / suggest? I think it is OK, so that low-quality answers don't stay as a bad example for all to see. In cases of obvious good faith from a newcomer it is also perfectly acceptable to ...


1

I'm ᔕᖺᘎᕊ! Here are my answers: :) Do you think that the current policy of "delete-on-sight (with a comment)" for low quality answers should continue? What, if any, changes would you make / suggest? I don't think it should continue, especially if the poster is new to the site. If they're new, then I think it would seem a bit annoying to them to see ...


1

Tom Here are some short and simple answers to the questions asked, Do you think that the current policy of "delete-on-sight (with a comment)" for low quality answers should continue? What, if any, changes would you make / suggest? Yes; however, an informative explanation is required discussing why it was deleted, a link should be given to what ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible