I'm not convinced that this question should have been closed: Looking for First Person, Physics based, Puzzle games
From what I see, two reasons have been given from Caleb and Gilles:
- Too broad
- No purpose
The question had an initial burst of answers (only seven of them, mind you) - seven is not really "too broad" by any definition of the term, especially when you consider that the bulk of them were posted by two users (GnomeSlice and I).
The purpose seems quite clear to me: the asker is looking for physics based puzzle games - it's right there in the title, and again in the body. This is no different from asking for a Self-hosted replacement for Github or a Cross platform JS/PHP editor software with FTP support and code hinting - and those are our two highest voted questions. The asker is clearly asking for a game with a very specific set of requirements, and that's exactly what we delivered.
It shouldn't (in my opinion) have been closed and it's a great example of a high quality game recommendation request.
With this in mind, can we get this reopened please? Or, can we get complete clarification on exactly why this was closed, as the reasons provided do not make sense (as explained above).