5

"emails" is a terrible term; email by itself is already a mass noun.

Can we have "emails" renamed to "email"?

7
  • Done. Why isnt there a "tag-rename", or "bad-tag" tag? – Ira Baxter Feb 20 '14 at 11:24
  • Because nobody has created one yet and you don't have the privs to do so. – Caleb Feb 20 '14 at 11:28
  • What, this isn't a standard discussion topic on every meta-site? – Ira Baxter Feb 20 '14 at 11:28
  • 2
    possible duplicate of Private beta cleanup: tag synonyms and tag merges - this answer in particular. – Flyk Feb 20 '14 at 11:37
  • 1
    Yes, the tag should be email. Not only because it's a mass noun (but it can also be a countable noun), but because that's the name that SO, SU, SF, AU, U&L, Android and Apple use. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Feb 20 '14 at 12:17
  • 1
    @Flyk It's better to discuss tags separately: one thread per tag or group of closely-related tag. Those mass tag questions are too broad, items tend to get lost there. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Feb 20 '14 at 12:18
  • Done........... – Robert Cartaino Feb 20 '14 at 13:45
6

Let's use [email]

Why? Well, emails is really the end result, but primarily because every other Stack Exchange site with an email tag uses [email] instead of [emails]. Let's keep it consistent.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .