I saw someone use the [web] tag (Web browser that can view page source for Android) . I think this tag is either a) too broad or b) needs a definition on proper use. Any thoughts?

  • ... And it looks like Robert has killed it. Thanks for bringing this up!
    – Undo
    Feb 7 '14 at 1:07

I believe the tag as it currently stands tag is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, and rhetorical and cannot be reasonably used.*

Therefor I think we should either:

*Man using that phrase felt good. I miss you NARQ!

  • 2
    Kill it. (By editing it out — you can't synonymize an ambiguous tag.) Feb 6 '14 at 23:18
  • @Gilles edit suggested.
    – Seth
    Feb 6 '14 at 23:18
  • I think we should just kill it to avoid any confusion between [web-browser] and [web-application]
    – Rajiv
    Feb 6 '14 at 23:18
  • I second the movement to kill it.
    – Undo
    Feb 6 '14 at 23:27
  • My only problem with this discussion is the distinctive lack of the word "Burninate." Feb 7 '14 at 1:24
  • @ValekHalfHeart Better?
    – Seth
    Feb 7 '14 at 1:26
  • @Seth Brilliant. I already upvoted, but this made me happy :) Feb 7 '14 at 1:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .