Skip to main content
replaced http://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Should questions regarding youtube video downloads be supported by this site? Quick Google search shows particular clauses of youtube terms, which are getting breached.

I received the commentcomment

@miroxlav Violating a terms of service agreement is not criminal in the US (and probably in many other countries). See the court decision Facebook v. Power Ventures – Franck Dernoncourt

But if something is not criminal, it might not necessarily mean that it is ethical. Especially in cases when someone expressed his will NOT TO DO IT. How will this site cope with the above issue?


EDIT: the exact paragraph of youtube terms is 4.C. (or 5.C. in some localized versions): You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

Should questions regarding youtube video downloads be supported by this site? Quick Google search shows particular clauses of youtube terms, which are getting breached.

I received the comment

@miroxlav Violating a terms of service agreement is not criminal in the US (and probably in many other countries). See the court decision Facebook v. Power Ventures – Franck Dernoncourt

But if something is not criminal, it might not necessarily mean that it is ethical. Especially in cases when someone expressed his will NOT TO DO IT. How will this site cope with the above issue?


EDIT: the exact paragraph of youtube terms is 4.C. (or 5.C. in some localized versions): You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

Should questions regarding youtube video downloads be supported by this site? Quick Google search shows particular clauses of youtube terms, which are getting breached.

I received the comment

@miroxlav Violating a terms of service agreement is not criminal in the US (and probably in many other countries). See the court decision Facebook v. Power Ventures – Franck Dernoncourt

But if something is not criminal, it might not necessarily mean that it is ethical. Especially in cases when someone expressed his will NOT TO DO IT. How will this site cope with the above issue?


EDIT: the exact paragraph of youtube terms is 4.C. (or 5.C. in some localized versions): You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

edited tags
Link
Izzy
  • 18.9k
  • 18
  • 33
added 41 characters in body
Source Link
miroxlav
  • 2.5k
  • 10
  • 6

Should questions regarding youtube video downloads be supported by this site? Quick Google search shows particular clauses of youtube terms, which are getting breached.

I received the comment

@miroxlav Violating a terms of service agreement is not criminal in the US (and probably in many other countries). See the court decision Facebook v. Power Ventures – Franck Dernoncourt

But if something is not criminal, it might not necessarily mean that it is ethical. Especially in cases when someone expressed his will NOT TO DO IT. How will this site cope with the above issue?


EDIT: the exact paragraph of youtube terms is 4.C. (or 5.C. in some localized versions): You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

Should questions regarding youtube video downloads be supported by this site? Quick Google search shows particular clauses of youtube terms, which are getting breached.

I received the comment

@miroxlav Violating a terms of service agreement is not criminal in the US (and probably in many other countries). See the court decision Facebook v. Power Ventures – Franck Dernoncourt

But if something is not criminal, it might not necessarily mean that it is ethical. Especially in cases when someone expressed his will NOT TO DO IT. How will this site cope with the above issue?


EDIT: the exact paragraph of youtube terms is 4.C.: You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

Should questions regarding youtube video downloads be supported by this site? Quick Google search shows particular clauses of youtube terms, which are getting breached.

I received the comment

@miroxlav Violating a terms of service agreement is not criminal in the US (and probably in many other countries). See the court decision Facebook v. Power Ventures – Franck Dernoncourt

But if something is not criminal, it might not necessarily mean that it is ethical. Especially in cases when someone expressed his will NOT TO DO IT. How will this site cope with the above issue?


EDIT: the exact paragraph of youtube terms is 4.C. (or 5.C. in some localized versions): You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

added 269 characters in body
Source Link
miroxlav
  • 2.5k
  • 10
  • 6
Loading
added 140 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
miroxlav
  • 2.5k
  • 10
  • 6
Loading