Timeline for Should titles actually be a question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:20 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Feb 26, 2014 at 0:31 | vote | accept | psubsee2003 | ||
Feb 11, 2014 at 21:25 | comment | added | Kenny Evitt | @Gilles, as a native English speaker, you're wrong. | |
Feb 11, 2014 at 20:15 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @KennyEvitt In idiomatic English — and the same kinds of formulations arise in most natural languages — “there is no reason for …” means “there is no compelling reason for …” or “the arguments against outweigh the arguments for …”. | |
Feb 11, 2014 at 20:14 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
pedant compliance
|
Feb 11, 2014 at 19:46 | comment | added | Kenny Evitt | @Gilles, I was commenting on the first sentence in your answer "TL,DR: no, there's no reason for the title to be a question.". | |
Feb 11, 2014 at 18:17 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @KennyEvitt That's fascinating. Would you mind sharing more? Are they actually good reasons? Can you point to usability studies? | |
Feb 11, 2014 at 18:02 | comment | added | Kenny Evitt | There are reasons for question titles to be questions. | |
Feb 5, 2014 at 13:50 | comment | added | DanteTheEgregore | Why was this downvoted? Unlike the other answer, it actually pulls from the faq on writing good titles. | |
Feb 5, 2014 at 11:46 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
that bit at the beginning was fluff, really
|
Feb 5, 2014 at 2:09 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |