Timeline for Too narrow tags: What to do with them?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2014 at 21:36 | comment | added | Izzy | Isn't it just one of the aspects to code-review or unit-test? IMHO rather something that belongs to the description. I might be wrong, though, not being a "real dev" :) | |
| Feb 16, 2014 at 21:32 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | I don't see what's wrong about code-coverage. It has a clear meaning, and is the natural term to use for tools that measure code coverage. Why do you consider it “much too specific”? | |
| Feb 16, 2014 at 21:05 | history | edited | Izzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Feb 15, 2014 at 19:11 | comment | added | Izzy |
I agree with @Braiam here (remove code-coverage), and don't think a merge+synonym makes sense here. The only question holding it currently could simply be re-tagged.
|
|
| Feb 15, 2014 at 18:12 | comment | added | Braiam | Remove it...... | |
| Feb 15, 2014 at 18:07 | comment | added | Angelo Fuchs | @Braiam This tags are already in use. What to do with them? | |
| Feb 15, 2014 at 18:06 | comment | added | Braiam | If a tag is already covered by another... why create it? | |
| Feb 15, 2014 at 17:17 | history | answered | Izzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |